这个问题以前有人问过,但现有的答案不太适合我的情况。
我想测试submitCode()
方法:
public class VerificationCodeViewModel{
//Input
public final ObservableField<String> verificationCode = new ObservableField<>();
//Output
public final ObservableField<String> requestError = new ObservableField<>();
public final ObservableBoolean loading = new ObservableBoolean();
public final ObservableField<LoginCredentials> loginCredentials = new ObservableField<>();
@NonNull private final Context context;
@NonNull private final UnverifiedUser unverifiedUser;
@NonNull private final CampaignRepository campaignRepository;
@NonNull private final AccountRepository accountRepository;
@NonNull private final VerificationCodeNavigator navigator;
public VerificationCodeViewModel(@NonNull Context context,
@NonNull UnverifiedUser unverifiedUser,
@NonNull CampaignRepository campaignRepository,
@NonNull AccountRepository accountRepository,
@NonNull VerificationCodeNavigator navigator) {
this.context = context;
this.unverifiedUser = unverifiedUser;
this.campaignRepository = campaignRepository;
this.accountRepository = accountRepository;
this.navigator = navigator;
}
public void submitCode() {
loading.set(true);
String sourceCampaign = null;
if (campaignRepository.getCampaign() != null) {
sourceCampaign = campaignRepository.getCampaign().getSource();
}
this.accountRepository.verifyMobileNumber(
this.unverifiedUser,
this.verificationCode.get(),
sourceCampaign,
new AccountDataSource.VerifyMobileNumberCallback() {
@Override
public void onVerificationSuccess(UnverifiedUser.Entity entity) {
loading.set(false);
loginCredentials.set(createLoginCredentials());
navigator.finishActivity(true);
}
@Override
public void onVerificationFailure(@Nullable String message) {
loading.set(false);
requestError.set(message);
}
}
);
}
}
我有以下测试用例:
public class VerificationCodeViewModelTests {
private VerificationCodeViewModel viewModel;
@Mock private Context context;
@Mock private UnverifiedUser unverifiedUser;
@Mock private CampaignRepository campaignRepository;
@Mock private AccountRepository accountRepository;
@Mock private VerificationCodeNavigator navigator;
@Mock private ArgumentCaptor<AccountDataSource.VerifyMobileNumberCallback> verifyMobileNumberCallbackCaptor;
@Before
public void setupVerificationCodeViewModel(){
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
viewModel = new VerificationCodeViewModel(
context,
unverifiedUser,
campaignRepository,
accountRepository,
mock(VerifyMobileNumberActivity.class)//navigator
);
}
@Test
public void testSubmitCode(){
viewModel.verificationCode.set(VERIFICATION_CODE);
viewModel.submitCode();
assertTrue(viewModel.loading.get());
verify(accountRepository).verifyMobileNumber(
eq(unverifiedUser),//line 132
eq(VERIFICATION_CODE),//line 133
eq(CAMPAIGN_SOURCE),//line 134
verifyMobileNumberCallbackCaptor.capture());//line 135
UnverifiedUser.Entity entity = mock(UnverifiedUser.Entity.class);
when(entity.getId()).thenReturn(ENTITY_ID);
verifyMobileNumberCallbackCaptor.getValue().onVerificationSuccess(entity);
assertFalse(viewModel.loading.get());
assertEquals(viewModel.loginCredentials.get().getUsername(),UNVERIFIED_USER_EMAIL);
assertEquals(viewModel.loginCredentials.get().getPassword(),UNVERIFIED_USER_PASSWORD);
verify(navigator).finishActivity(true);
}
}
当我验证是否调用了会出现以下错误:
org. mockito.Exctions.misuse.InvalidUseOfMatchersException:参数匹配器的使用无效!预期0个匹配器,记录3个:-
如果匹配器与原始值组合在一起,则可能会出现此异常://不正确:一些方法(anyObject(),"原始字符串");使用匹配器时,所有参数都必须由匹配器提供。例如://正确:一些方法(anyObject(), eq("String by matcher"));
有关详细信息,请参阅匹配器类的javadoc。
在…验证CodeViewModelTest. testSubmitCode(VerificationCodeViewModelTests.java:135)
我不明白的是为什么它说0匹配预期?其他答案建议将eq(…)
替换为any(….)
或isA(…)
。首先,我认为这不适用,因为错误是首先不期望匹配器;其次,我已经尝试过了,问题仍然存在。
如果有人能解释为什么期望0匹配器以及如何解决这个问题,我将不胜感激。
更新
Account tReposity. verifyMobileNumber()
的实现是:
AccountRepository.java
public class AccountRepository implements AccountDataSource {
@Override
public void verifyMobileNumber(@NonNull UnverifiedUser unverifiedUser,
@NonNull String verificationCode,
@Nullable String sourceCampaign,
@NonNull VerifyMobileNumberCallback callback) {
this.remoteSource.verifyMobileNumber(unverifiedUser, verificationCode, sourceCampaign, callback);
}
}
AccountRemoteDataSource.java
public class AccountRemoteDataSource implements AccountDataSource {
@Override
public void verifyMobileNumber(@NonNull UnverifiedUser unverifiedUser,
@NonNull String verificationCode,
@Nullable String sourceCampaign,
@NonNull final VerifyMobileNumberCallback callback) {
accountService().verifyMobileNumber(/*params*/).enqueue(new Callback() {
@Override
public void onResponse(Response response, Retrofit retrofit) {
try{
//parse response
callback.onVerificationSuccess(entity);
} catch (Exception e) {
callback.onVerificationFailure(e.getMessage());
}
}
@Override
public void onFailure(Throwable t) {
callback.onVerificationFailure(t.getMessage());
}
});
}
}
哈哈哈,找到了!您在测试文件的第六个注释字段中错误地使用了@Mock ArgumentCaptor
。
@Mock private ArgumentCaptor<AccountDataSource.VerifyMobileNumberCallback>
verifyMobileNumberCallbackCaptor;
Mockito没有对自己的基础设施进行特殊处理,因此它没有发现您试图模拟Mockito本身的事实。通过在验证
调用中间调用方法ArgumentCaptor. catch()
,Mockito假定您实际上正在尝试验证对捕获
的调用。
尽管它的语法很聪明,但Mockito实际上只是一个状态机,其中验证(…)
的调用开始验证,每次调用匹配器都会将匹配器描述推送到内部堆栈上,然后下一次调用Mockito mock触发验证。Mockito在参数匹配器堆栈上看到三个匹配器,用于捕获
的零参数调用。这就是为什么记录了3个匹配器,预期为0。
将该注释切换到@Captor
,您应该可以开始了。